In Peter McLaren’s “Critical
Pedgogy: A Look at the Major Concepts”, I felt there was further clarification
of how Freire’s “Pedogogy of the Oppressed” may be applied to American
classrooms of the 21st century.
I find it frustrating as a student, when the teacher inserts his or her
own values or political views overtly in a lecture. The teacher has a position of power in the
classroom and possibly undue influence over the student regarding his or her
views. To realize beyond this obvious
attempt at applying their own particular bias, there are countless hidden ways
the teacher may influence the students is something I haven’t really stopped to
consider. This information will make me
much more aware of what perspective I take when presenting a subject and will
help me remember to keep as objective a view of the piece as possible.
Although I can’t say it was a
complete surprise, it was disheartening to hear how the male and female students
were still being treated differently in our classrooms. I would have thought at the time of this
writing (2009?) there would be more awareness of, and more success at curbing,
sexist or racist bias in classrooms by the teachers. The mention that even though the boys were out
talking the girls three to one, the girls were the ones held up as the more disruptive
with their talking. Although this is
clearly a bias which short changes the female students, this result calls into
question for me what other outdated and narrow-minded treatment are all of our
students subjected to.
No comments:
Post a Comment